{"id":"W2621830749","doi":"10.1109/sapiw.2017.7944006","title":"A magneto-quasi-static surface formulation to calculate the impedance of 3D interconnects with arbitrary cross-section","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Admittance; Discretization; Electrical conductor; Electrical impedance; Surface (topology); Computation; Integral equation; Mathematical analysis; Operator (biology); Cross section (physics); Conductor; Magneto; Mathematics; Physics; Geometry; Electrical engineering; Algorithm; Engineering; Power (physics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001285282,0.0001094697,0.0001477113,0.00002446931,0.0002588697,0.0001481385,0.000204138,0.00001694819,0.0001884813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007037982,0.00006873536,0.00006012393,0.00007730641,0.00004649497,0.0001633365,0.00004099939,0.00008246618,0.0000129149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001013505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002299107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002071874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001122457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993341,0.0000208551,0.0001693385,0.0001801311,0.0001175202,0.000178059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992498,0.00004579548,0.0001490838,0.0004441193,0.00006872742,0.00004249221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003084347,0.0003422381,0.7932503,0.000106465,0.0005533458,0.000003632282,0.0025398,0.0190402,0.1037343,0.01391208,0.0004063767,0.06580288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002289152,0.002189733,0.7336664,0.0002440187,0.0003209054,0.00000798885,0.000682081,0.171415,0.08246012,0.005379153,0.000491849,0.0008535386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9699042,0.000007497487,0.02404003,0.0003979856,0.00004195905,0.0001330422,0.000004701893,0.00001509272,0.005455428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957374,5.803258e-7,0.00200433,0.00005494916,0.00007841887,0.000009463035,0.000005556636,0.00001116967,0.00209818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1523748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3132068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01045677545499125,"score_gpt":0.2767822633142398,"score_spread":0.2663254878592486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}