{"id":"W2622279720","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.059","title":"Towards validation of the Canadian precipitation analysis (CaPA) for hydrologic modeling applications in the Canadian Prairies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Manitoba Hydro","keywords":"Environmental science; Forcing (mathematics); Watershed; Proxy (statistics); Precipitation; Climatology; Hydrological modelling; Hydrology (agriculture); Meteorology; Computer science; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001204058,0.0000757841,0.0001918529,0.0001965449,0.001051078,0.00003253152,0.0006791264,0.00009209022,0.00002444462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001861496,0.00004456449,0.0001168584,0.0001675363,0.0003202927,0.0001675741,0.00005266123,0.0001495493,0.00000276301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000177961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008646808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5065138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9873254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991109,0.0001216161,0.0002906486,0.0001114168,0.0001460058,0.0002193571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991987,0.00005974623,0.0003714334,0.0002841344,0.0000332496,0.00005272702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001603572,0.00002124705,0.5472797,0.000003752649,0.0001614428,0.000001809657,0.001755922,0.4493235,0.00002448113,0.0009045348,0.0002517508,0.0002558301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005984653,0.0002444836,0.8165701,0.000005862527,0.0009515975,0.00001335882,0.0003247522,0.1234012,0.0001735589,0.05082253,0.006728185,0.0001658567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9619381,0.00002411944,0.001511852,0.03230973,0.00009223623,0.0003526972,0.000007675313,0.000001396146,0.003762154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991794,0.000009016736,0.0002271191,0.000480399,0.00002840525,0.00003546224,0.000004387097,0.000003099249,0.00003274572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4808117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8084145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02779485187490194,"score_gpt":0.2753737819827838,"score_spread":0.2475789301078818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}