{"id":"W2622625470","doi":"10.4073/csr.2008.10","title":"Benefit‐Cost Analyses of Sentencing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Saint Louis University; McGill University; Vanderbilt University; Australian Institute of Criminology; American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Quality (philosophy); Cost–benefit analysis; Order (exchange); Criminal justice; Sentencing guidelines; Risk analysis (engineering); Actuarial science; Business; Psychology; Management science; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Criminology; Psychiatry; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001739767,0.0001242957,0.0009864856,0.0001457383,0.0004417344,0.00002093596,0.0002479781,0.00005092862,0.0002032951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00167746,0.00008876651,0.000447687,0.000893608,0.0001198292,0.0001198761,0.00002192826,0.00006329163,0.0002516833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008351551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007180482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007202389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003129163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976019,0.0006048761,0.001018218,0.0001806006,0.0003910989,0.0002033267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998238,0.0003492313,0.0006859447,0.000400712,0.0002243837,0.0001016834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003002823,0.001038361,0.01391774,0.4703252,0.001715321,0.0001463027,0.4015691,0.0009000316,0.008019131,0.01180063,0.01499154,0.07554664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004031044,0.0001075487,0.0002941581,0.03910527,0.007539642,0.0001346333,0.8809649,0.001300722,0.001004813,0.0001802584,0.06793157,0.001033387],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7946524,0.1200033,0.02406564,0.0001853004,0.0013338,0.01004004,0.000007642694,0.0001529671,0.04955892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710838,0.0250243,0.0005051279,0.00007885576,0.0001832674,0.0002418401,0.000002798941,0.00001042803,0.002869537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4793958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2439177429057669,"score_gpt":0.4178747715045978,"score_spread":0.1739570285988309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}