{"id":"W2622625470","doi":"10.4073/csr.2008.10","title":"Benefit‐Cost Analyses of Sentencing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Saint Louis University; McGill University; Vanderbilt University; Australian Institute of Criminology; American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Quality (philosophy); Cost–benefit analysis; Order (exchange); Criminal justice; Sentencing guidelines; Risk analysis (engineering); Actuarial science; Business; Psychology; Management science; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Criminology; Psychiatry; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05168796,0.002835188,0.008717394,0.01562514,0.000715514,0.00573618,0.003065069,0.003068721,0.01704578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2325238,0.001393023,0.0229613,0.01174658,0.001231047,0.004734254,0.003164798,0.005180509,0.0006759195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01503261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009524365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00660481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008956072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8823842,0.08441732,0.0112793,0.002190529,0.01825292,0.001475697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7576118,0.2153519,0.01351455,0.003034401,0.009817004,0.0006703413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009034212,0.0004514362,0.007241764,0.4406423,0.09621852,0.0004690641,0.0004714364,0.02523742,0.0003028372,0.0337,0.009709221,0.3765218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007354385,0.009002954,0.04632413,0.4567389,0.2791668,0.002591349,0.001753945,0.01933036,0.002107888,0.07892073,0.09610604,0.0006024748],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02107479,0.9279202,0.01266881,0.005006736,0.002680337,0.007953218,0.008374494,0.0001166841,0.0142047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.391565,0.5655643,0.0230129,0.001801113,0.001275246,0.0110923,0.003519222,0.0001128519,0.002057061],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05168796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2733553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2439177429057669,"score_gpt":0.4178747715045978,"score_spread":0.1739570285988309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}