{"id":"W2623947114","doi":"10.1515/sg-2014-0004","title":"Clonal Variation of Eucalypts in Susceptibility to Bacterial Wilt Detected by Using Different Inoculation Methods","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Silvae genetica/Silvae Genetica","topic":"Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research","keywords":"Biology; Bacterial wilt; Inoculation; Ralstonia solanacearum; Repeatability; Clonal selection; Wilt disease; Genetic variation; Coefficient of variation; Veterinary medicine; Horticulture; Microbiology; Genetics; Immunology; Pathogen","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009236746,0.0003891544,0.000631426,0.00006380917,0.0001523072,0.00005933172,0.0004049587,0.0002686639,0.0003396512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005233019,0.0002088624,0.0001448034,0.0005564042,0.0001326486,0.00006290839,0.0002973304,0.0001582994,0.00001635173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001056082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002383186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003408222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001742527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960464,0.00114269,0.0009313775,0.0008215256,0.0004235945,0.0006344088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985135,0.0005659871,0.0002680954,0.000246353,0.0001693463,0.0002367706],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001441429,0.0001497285,0.02273747,0.00001514439,0.00002629486,4.228018e-7,0.0001438143,0.00009069707,0.9394001,0.00001834524,0.00002579267,0.03724803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003561477,0.000414144,0.829004,0.00002959433,0.00005182111,0.000003474734,0.00003302495,0.0018897,0.1669478,0.0003181006,0.0006019013,0.0003503049],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962353,0.0001372251,0.001979653,0.000258,0.0003915893,0.0006622299,0.0002127737,0.00005162331,0.00007166623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977271,0.00003439068,0.02207429,0.00008104157,0.0003208423,0.00003933957,0.0001601021,0.000005909418,0.00001309288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8062665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8517162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02291674913521511,"score_gpt":0.2671790978063593,"score_spread":0.2442623486711442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}