{"id":"W2624107579","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2017.1335424","title":"Non-causal understanding with economic models: the case of general equilibrium","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Methodology","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Arrow; General equilibrium theory; Mathematical model; Economic model; Economics; Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Positive economics; Causal model; Management science; Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002164952,0.0001064656,0.0003969661,0.0001130558,0.0005266081,0.0001153397,0.000562207,0.00004100972,0.0004303714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002908259,0.00006898656,0.0001209981,0.000002879969,0.001428718,0.0007841702,0.00006762521,0.0001872823,0.000009486645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001923238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002020657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000518873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001657385,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990747,0.0001395496,0.000451763,0.0001305461,0.00003437914,0.0001690936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998022,0.0003376036,0.001220156,0.0003168111,0.00003449036,0.0000689643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001944196,0.00001206291,0.00004175111,0.00001073774,0.000118759,0.0001340452,0.006616801,0.006654638,0.0002586117,0.98445,0.001262083,0.0002460909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001538749,0.001169993,0.00006209363,0.00004473335,0.0001863087,0.004992217,0.00748274,0.02450529,0.0004736661,0.953039,0.006191012,0.0003142291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8778117,0.000137339,0.003412857,0.002029545,0.002678275,0.00007322691,0.00001622106,0.000003413503,0.1138374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944843,0.00001942154,0.003470099,0.000100856,0.001314757,9.450121e-7,1.661545e-7,0.000009714653,0.0005997171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1166726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5264172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5056960066742112,"score_gpt":0.3594049601400753,"score_spread":0.1462910465341359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}