{"id":"W2624754555","doi":"","title":"An Empirical Evaluation of Fair-Division Algorithms","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Fair division; Division (mathematics); Economic Justice; Algorithm; Empirical research; Genetic algorithm; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Arithmetic; Law; Political science; Machine learning; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043314,0.001063087,0.0009965579,0.003394258,0.001799015,0.00216046,0.002202865,0.002285457,0.0044886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2182564,0.0003102896,0.0006833327,0.003218151,0.003008875,0.003387812,0.00199208,0.001789583,0.0007023943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002967461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001750953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002968813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00239135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9608198,0.02784364,0.002264959,0.002191601,0.006097989,0.000781964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.654258,0.3022579,0.008101725,0.01820286,0.01480576,0.002373836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01052022,0.008896844,0.1556379,0.001962459,0.00118488,0.0002637228,0.002820538,0.3991538,0.002222005,0.07065649,0.01937522,0.3273059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001686922,0.004471455,0.03946027,0.0003383494,0.0002217019,0.000343001,0.002168507,0.8949698,0.003227355,0.03962441,0.01338462,0.0001036865],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9222875,0.00288983,0.04889659,0.001426337,0.0002026705,0.001095525,0.001162758,0.0003842069,0.02165461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693066,0.0002643289,0.02782388,0.000130972,0.00004071651,0.000421828,0.001106784,0.00005779145,0.0008471482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.043314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2290691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1075965344674933,"score_gpt":0.3889604023258884,"score_spread":0.281363867858395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}