{"id":"W2624849057","doi":"10.1037/cep0000123","title":"Re-reading after mind wandering.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mind-wandering; Psychology; PsycINFO; Reading (process); Cognitive psychology; Context (archaeology); Theory of mind; Focus (optics); Cognition; Linguistics; MEDLINE; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001389304,0.0002842742,0.0003261881,0.0007021493,0.0005443906,0.001286952,0.0003952096,0.0008335603,0.004515405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01954989,0.000135779,0.0004689799,0.0004332697,0.0005090458,0.001607975,0.0009295723,0.001082421,0.001175278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003554075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003125955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008968492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002501188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994034,0.0002229843,0.00006074105,0.0001124611,0.0001440102,0.00005636922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920014,0.003588733,0.002007606,0.0009846889,0.0008814299,0.0005360292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002253482,0.0008724301,0.1868536,0.003779008,0.0007434675,0.009673817,0.09398569,0.0002497296,0.03751352,0.005399675,0.01759855,0.641077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001146476,0.001968253,0.851736,0.001334927,0.0004609497,0.01768076,0.03047005,0.0007717667,0.01324431,0.01742641,0.06465267,0.000139242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9586989,0.01172088,0.006942059,0.001954791,0.0003805989,0.0001837945,0.0007774986,0.0004716069,0.01886983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807601,0.003349906,0.005264773,0.0009798218,0.0001342026,0.0001108571,0.0008962469,0.00008082728,0.008423368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004515405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01510555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08222884760421009,"score_gpt":0.3438769666838236,"score_spread":0.2616481190796135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}