{"id":"W2624849057","doi":"10.1037/cep0000123","title":"Re-reading after mind wandering.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mind-wandering; Psychology; PsycINFO; Reading (process); Cognitive psychology; Context (archaeology); Theory of mind; Focus (optics); Cognition; Linguistics; MEDLINE; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006481211,0.0003746508,0.0004369606,0.0004780384,0.0008775053,0.0003180058,0.001508143,0.0002534493,0.001599597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003953847,0.0003937199,0.0002816301,0.0001276402,0.0007366401,0.0005601061,0.00006471724,0.0005612742,0.0001173658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007533074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002540365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001716562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01597978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996963,0.0001392937,0.0006590412,0.0007388935,0.000121207,0.001378619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964907,0.0000560423,0.0006634315,0.001090579,0.00005785011,0.001641426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004595839,0.0002931017,0.02616609,0.00001689146,0.00006942244,0.007143496,0.006959003,0.00001006111,0.939581,0.0003018785,0.01137547,0.007624032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006862159,0.002623308,0.09496097,0.0005652229,0.00008833874,0.007703597,0.01069999,0.00006230902,0.8339957,0.001853878,0.03892785,0.001656662],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708038,0.0008133041,0.0001018886,0.001897958,0.004515371,0.0002135781,0.00004459198,0.00001631101,0.02159319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957171,0.00002814886,0.0007140278,0.002146523,0.0004963932,0.0000295828,0.000002984212,0.00005739768,0.0008078372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1055853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08222884760421009,"score_gpt":0.3438769666838236,"score_spread":0.2616481190796135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}