{"id":"W2624952331","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21284","title":"Declining survival of black brant from subarctic and arctic breeding areas","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Subarctic climate; Arctic; Anatidae; Seabird; Vital rates; Population; Branta; Demography; Mark and recapture; Waterfowl; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Population growth","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004888617,0.0002225265,0.0001736001,0.0006402862,0.0006191942,0.0005457145,0.0002582326,0.0001843682,0.001359406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000924169,0.0001220889,0.0002078086,0.0004022524,0.0004022112,0.0002839849,0.0004325084,0.0002659649,0.0002272842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007878788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003906154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09206221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2465285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997805,0.00003173672,0.00001077742,0.00008445692,0.00005173646,0.00004091703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998848,0.00007046885,0.0005636812,0.00006413778,0.0002133836,0.0002403522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005296139,0.000008720027,0.9942345,0.00001183647,0.00004110418,0.00007766312,0.0003760666,0.0001124449,0.001408513,0.0000308433,0.000210875,0.00343447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001021312,0.00002168407,0.9986903,0.000009050226,0.00001088541,0.00008757817,0.0004684011,0.0001459435,0.0001467827,0.00001728677,0.0003986559,0.00000242997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990402,0.0001628258,0.00009104686,0.0000311562,0.000006116133,0.000001227637,0.0001718161,0.000006651643,0.0004889483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989039,0.0001034553,0.0001269882,0.00003405279,0.000003624145,0.000002693154,0.0003415574,0.000004878178,0.0004789263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09206221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1830527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02667202953853359,"score_gpt":0.2664350218489492,"score_spread":0.2397629923104156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}