{"id":"W2625098516","doi":"10.1177/0308518x17713993","title":"Commodifying art, Chinese style: The making of China’s visual art market","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning A Economy and Space","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; China; Art market; Superpower; Politics; Chinese art; Style (visual arts); Value (mathematics); Contemporary art; Capital (architecture); Sociology; Economic geography; Economy; Political science; Political economy; Aesthetics; Economics; History; Law; Visual arts; Art; Art history","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004245673,0.00009117992,0.0001284886,0.00001324871,0.001281564,0.0001936394,0.0001148966,0.00005320313,0.0003735847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003203754,0.0000630629,0.00002168536,0.00001046103,0.000305005,0.000169544,0.0001052716,0.0001119996,0.000005928503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001842079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001130692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001178621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008497191,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994985,0.00004162863,0.0001052465,0.0001333574,0.00006643457,0.0001548026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996577,0.00005120681,0.0001420258,0.0001086024,0.000002412695,0.00003804038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004124735,0.00002301752,0.8539681,0.0000168926,0.00005650353,0.0000074566,0.02516132,0.00003358085,0.000009219699,0.0008532983,0.1108379,0.008991397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001367743,0.00001544381,0.3188168,0.00003242012,0.000007361368,0.000001469048,0.004085376,0.0002229073,0.000003087196,0.0001070767,0.6764799,0.00009138696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8122569,0.0006025573,0.00004801766,0.01481379,0.00009533627,0.0001686278,0.000003905508,0.000009869994,0.172001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614531,0.0001967547,0.00007419714,0.00009081179,0.0001083835,0.000005072878,0.000002615119,0.000003422701,0.03806565],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5656419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9856881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02753284907438937,"score_gpt":0.2803571114142314,"score_spread":0.252824262339842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}