{"id":"W2625301323","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2017-0019","title":"Kriging prediction of stand-level forest information using mobile laser scanning data adjusted for nondetection","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norsk institutt for Bioøkonomi; European Commission","keywords":"Kriging; Laser scanning; Statistics; Environmental science; Forest inventory; Random forest; Forestry; Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Laser; Forest management; Artificial intelligence; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000806346,0.000425669,0.0004090485,0.000669747,0.0002249783,0.0003387318,0.0003908087,0.0002671973,0.0002428329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002654001,0.0002901824,0.0004995562,0.0007490655,0.0001966891,0.0004108278,0.0001941378,0.0005066594,0.0001414422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006198304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009544403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02692152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04849778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996554,0.00009402604,0.00002206081,0.00008655908,0.0001012932,0.00004066397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990588,0.0005322251,0.000111361,0.00008720878,0.0001904083,0.00001997961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001338017,0.0001033569,0.05928482,0.00006276761,0.00008507063,0.00009283407,0.0001436544,0.8658586,0.0130956,0.0008667284,0.0001794275,0.06009334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000980563,0.0000565341,0.02102475,0.000004125378,0.00001157042,0.00002065868,0.00002196534,0.9759474,0.002394711,0.0003379647,0.0001577798,0.00001273462],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8009894,0.00007465285,0.1979849,0.00002726191,0.000007275309,0.00002654691,0.0002860964,0.0002917119,0.0003121964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9453155,0.00003720043,0.05390933,0.000005151207,0.000002422258,0.00002718025,0.000398573,0.00001871525,0.0002860279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02692152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05352962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1691246141725308,"score_gpt":0.3624310067668938,"score_spread":0.1933063925943631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}