{"id":"W2625371932","doi":"10.1111/capa.12215","title":"Awareness and use of systematic literature reviews and meta‐analyses by ministerial policy analysts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Policy analysis; Evidence-based policy; Political science; Public relations; Business; MEDLINE; Public administration; Medicine; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6601936,0.0007908579,0.002998483,0.03390804,0.003031008,0.01671577,0.003838505,0.005200297,0.002985989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9000523,0.002633886,0.002973316,0.02481441,0.006733228,0.01374065,0.01084156,0.006943375,0.0004487643],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02246785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07476447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04840087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06131239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2258523,0.566015,0.111123,0.01210528,0.08131899,0.003585455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03487068,0.8282602,0.04605191,0.02895411,0.05843334,0.003429743],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002040609,0.0001284676,0.1794577,0.08070121,0.009879664,0.0006320426,0.1152318,0.001914186,0.002976802,0.03164812,0.05487539,0.5205141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000683512,0.0005296278,0.1410075,0.3807563,0.01127283,0.002043538,0.04632591,0.00797234,0.004808129,0.04208275,0.3612496,0.001268058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1049407,0.3174674,0.05968553,0.4612615,0.00398182,0.00381738,0.006293357,0.0007278787,0.04182455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7908573,0.09792875,0.07403246,0.02841135,0.001296479,0.004635852,0.001195382,0.0002821893,0.00136026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9775321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4190419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5664630750604633,"score_gpt":0.5521975245560327,"score_spread":0.01426555050443068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}