{"id":"W2625741854","doi":"","title":"Law of inertia for the factorization of cubic polynomials - the real case","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas Mathematica","topic":"Polynomial and algebraic computation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Discriminant; Monic polynomial; Factorization; Prime factor; Integer (computer science); Class (philosophy); Polynomial; Cubic function; Combinatorics; Prime (order theory); Unique factorization domain; Square (algebra); Difference polynomials; Orthogonal polynomials; Mathematical analysis; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005013355,0.00008526848,0.0001735227,0.00002013469,0.0003868664,0.00008176384,0.0008928609,0.00003111396,0.000008583222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002919014,0.00004489358,0.00009420778,0.00005303738,0.0002063056,0.0002164117,0.0002002781,0.00003907325,0.000003336373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009241147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000400473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000381508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004626765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992319,0.00003767938,0.0003289348,0.0001331976,0.0001428049,0.0001255322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975986,0.0009875153,0.0003697105,0.0009312159,0.00008700438,0.00002589154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009321726,0.00005401784,0.00002091166,0.00009062998,0.00003733981,0.000001850755,0.002588476,0.00001862022,0.001607479,0.981338,0.0003496692,0.0138837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009979827,0.0002759552,0.003571491,0.0001464388,0.0001461598,0.0001075046,0.0004936042,0.295988,0.04770673,0.6482742,0.001994672,0.0002973202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1145716,0.0001228518,0.8764275,0.0031682,0.0004527597,0.0008688003,0.00003694209,0.00004626655,0.00430511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952121,0.00000413953,0.004598352,0.00003970361,0.00005176375,0.00002237924,0.000001004937,0.000005152957,0.00006542781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8806405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2975503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04000426595464072,"score_gpt":0.2999675448691068,"score_spread":0.2599632789144661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}