{"id":"W2625938418","doi":"","title":"Méthodes d'estimation des risques machines : Analyse bibliographique","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Estimation; Computer science; Realization (probability); Fuzzy logic; Process (computing); Risk analysis (engineering); Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics; Systems engineering; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01596677,0.002194742,0.002926224,0.02133047,0.0008797403,0.005753707,0.002609597,0.003200526,0.02232633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1202636,0.001542329,0.003208105,0.01236985,0.001259976,0.003353412,0.001049283,0.002803298,0.007613954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002288878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003021069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01875804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01011708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9733306,0.0113455,0.002147042,0.002917524,0.009958941,0.0003003976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8684838,0.1148841,0.002580173,0.004399855,0.009498237,0.0001537198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005151056,0.0001600372,0.01801337,0.008029858,0.00180809,0.0001540639,0.0007483204,0.0434111,0.005696971,0.02534912,0.02287491,0.8732391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007567153,0.0007162244,0.1576079,0.008872649,0.003442158,0.001875512,0.001056182,0.3494348,0.05049292,0.05343447,0.3716764,0.0006340757],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02378252,0.06359497,0.8720272,0.001681435,0.0006900285,0.0005418084,0.01519978,0.005120077,0.01736215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2007538,0.0541812,0.7014022,0.0006967094,0.001384667,0.003069382,0.01689415,0.001985981,0.01963186],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08444136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06140013126627151,"score_gpt":0.3922822260750043,"score_spread":0.3308820948087328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}