{"id":"W2626024435","doi":"10.1177/1609406917711351","title":"Negotiating the Complexities and Risks of Interdisciplinary Qualitative Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Qualitative research; Vulnerability (computing); Engineering ethics; Legitimacy; Discipline; Knowledge production; Sociology; Politics; Work (physics); Political science; Public relations; Knowledge management; Social science; Engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1187799,0.0001380933,0.0004496133,0.0007070791,0.001051961,0.001128052,0.002897024,0.00006001726,0.00011423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0437521,0.00007888286,0.000182918,0.000291723,0.002590725,0.001257773,0.001941107,0.0006985311,0.000009610059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001030756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000259665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009611108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006029691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9705975,0.02360751,0.001594438,0.000269556,0.003665696,0.0002652851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9474347,0.03713069,0.002427364,0.0005285927,0.01235417,0.0001245513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001394604,0.0001225793,0.0004991443,0.00001160689,0.0004281598,0.00003028327,0.6987479,0.0001091331,0.005021224,0.2222889,0.005163813,0.06618267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003704499,0.0004543784,0.005001264,0.00008107994,0.00000689297,0.00002813597,0.5028709,0.00122374,0.001590889,0.4874636,0.0008475165,0.00006120971],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6751881,0.001017121,0.2508256,0.0511884,0.002384014,0.0003262749,0.0001369634,0.000005494134,0.01892797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578542,0.00002425635,0.04075585,0.00003393241,0.0004499258,0.000008857637,0.000001481559,0.000009684228,0.0008618626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.282666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9586975352993728,"score_gpt":0.8307905136799791,"score_spread":0.1279070216193937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}