{"id":"W2626024435","doi":"10.1177/1609406917711351","title":"Negotiating the Complexities and Risks of Interdisciplinary Qualitative Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negotiation; Qualitative research; Vulnerability (computing); Engineering ethics; Legitimacy; Discipline; Knowledge production; Sociology; Politics; Work (physics); Political science; Public relations; Knowledge management; Social science; Engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6046885,0.002056213,0.003262121,0.008758377,0.04535884,0.03748113,0.008775657,0.01017205,0.002772638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4841368,0.004216391,0.002361225,0.005592765,0.09757541,0.02967983,0.06003216,0.01614155,0.0009382077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02023638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0319875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00387723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006916659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1926423,0.7554023,0.01188343,0.009311418,0.02339297,0.007367535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.262888,0.6731672,0.01681539,0.0216597,0.01801076,0.007458995],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079108,0.00005132073,0.001476549,0.0005908166,0.00006112882,0.001069744,0.9458902,0.0004213649,0.0005114389,0.03658172,0.0006655615,0.01260104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005652705,0.0001012856,0.0005288204,0.002549223,0.00004441457,0.001004979,0.8705826,0.001182565,0.0006254098,0.09346649,0.02976294,0.00009478514],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3120559,0.01490027,0.4503106,0.1780217,0.003099174,0.005468552,0.0001682958,0.0003875442,0.03558791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8540642,0.003611553,0.1145794,0.01284627,0.0005552039,0.01084715,0.00006499582,0.0002629987,0.003168307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3953115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4874895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9586975352993728,"score_gpt":0.8307905136799791,"score_spread":0.1279070216193937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}