{"id":"W2626143055","doi":"10.2308/0148-4184.29.2.91","title":"PROFESSIONAL DOMINANCE: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING AND MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING, 1926–1986","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Historians Journal","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Management accounting; Positive accounting; Accounting management; Financial accounting; Mark-to-market accounting; Accounting information system; Accounting standard; Dominance (genetics); Business; Cost accounting; Constraints accounting; Relevance (law); Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004660798,0.0001461404,0.0001519051,0.003166123,0.00288815,0.003648615,0.0002334274,0.001087893,0.003191762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02415599,0.0002392412,0.00008121098,0.003527255,0.006924344,0.003461745,0.001507447,0.001796026,0.0004205465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008010016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004002335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04054199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0499206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975177,0.0008735484,0.000128573,0.0001950509,0.0008632247,0.000422017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808672,0.01020634,0.003646965,0.0003986358,0.003802217,0.00107866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003496991,0.0001280096,0.07794935,0.0002354486,0.00001978522,0.0006376237,0.08989044,0.0004649234,0.0005526032,0.5735514,0.03393573,0.2222849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000291713,0.00009035242,0.3240932,0.0005515923,0.00001880989,0.001110023,0.01557082,0.0006194352,0.0006813758,0.04920607,0.6079748,0.0000544466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5424361,0.08207218,0.001973536,0.0914773,0.001072774,0.00002148438,0.0001385616,0.00002882081,0.2807793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719079,0.01193097,0.0002975519,0.001987308,0.001414944,0.000006332813,0.00004114394,0.00001054871,0.01240339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04054199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08061206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02166036308287091,"score_gpt":0.2217199139327966,"score_spread":0.2000595508499257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}