{"id":"W2626721480","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1706544114","title":"Evidence of bias in assessment of fisheries management impacts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Fisheries management; Fishery; Stock assessment; Fisheries science; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology; Fishing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1470825,0.000474073,0.001315676,0.002290455,0.002238915,0.004830164,0.004071677,0.02598068,0.006062913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4381611,0.000553627,0.001553666,0.002494018,0.01052975,0.005302459,0.004323594,0.02163927,0.003345239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005435469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005205231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00652047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0096707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8942623,0.05859527,0.0120617,0.006931159,0.02553252,0.002616954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4393696,0.4873645,0.01738271,0.01429006,0.03726372,0.004329506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001021965,0.0001122665,0.04419148,0.0007042882,0.0006086803,0.002332337,0.0036991,0.0003960273,0.0005576944,0.06040487,0.7086606,0.1773107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009901158,0.0003869913,0.03519778,0.006596943,0.0006945485,0.004324471,0.004171916,0.00232635,0.002489771,0.2655551,0.6769545,0.0003114801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003955415,0.00222109,0.0008192414,0.9794719,0.005085517,0.00002638582,0.0001958623,0.00001959418,0.008205007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0605795,0.001785469,0.001183718,0.9160822,0.01792392,0.00006978856,0.0001305031,0.0000437365,0.002201169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8529174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7778561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1396470653228839,"score_gpt":0.3727077472631258,"score_spread":0.2330606819402419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}