{"id":"W2627079998","doi":"10.4000/revus.3832","title":"The possibility of naturalistic jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revus","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Legal positivism; Positivism; Epistemology; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Contradiction; Natural (archaeology); Legal formalism; Natural law; Philosophy; Sociology; Legal realism; Law; Political science; Legal research; Comparative law; Black letter law; History; Private law; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001750352,0.00004058106,0.00005942029,0.000005773858,0.0004625802,0.00003070767,0.0005270969,0.00002249338,0.00001569091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009154145,0.00002361835,0.00003722759,0.00001675749,0.0004079195,0.00006145051,0.0000729512,0.00007781629,0.00005674343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009108642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001055395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002524046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006888673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999483,0.00003636791,0.00009880156,0.0001467832,0.0001307713,0.0001042502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992212,0.0001445824,0.0001070904,0.0004824515,0.000018368,0.00002627722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003512686,0.0004371,0.03256094,0.0001081291,0.00001843832,0.00009733583,0.0002850564,0.0000124789,0.6010326,0.2342046,0.01359455,0.1172975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002171009,0.00006697668,0.8874196,0.0000354516,0.000006077616,0.00003135964,0.000006224304,0.00009256524,0.06958485,0.03280745,0.009644727,0.00008757252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829662,0.0001234271,0.00001012388,0.00558162,0.0006243511,0.00006697299,0.000005979137,0.000009844438,0.01061141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981849,0.00008915702,0.00003574694,0.0002039678,0.00004071535,0.000002125262,1.133391e-7,0.00000169158,0.00144157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8548587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.355784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1618340352291428,"score_gpt":0.3580328264316849,"score_spread":0.1961987912025421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}