{"id":"W2630332952","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.015","title":"A ‘curse of knowledge’ in the absence of knowledge? People misattribute fluency when judging how common knowledge is among their peers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Misattribution of memory; Psychology; Hindsight bias; Fluency; Curse; Processing fluency; Feeling; Cognitive psychology; Perspective (graphical); Cognition; Cognitive bias; Social psychology; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006249823,0.0001988043,0.0003189214,0.0001549418,0.0003696555,0.00005048944,0.0008382361,0.0001141615,0.00005897132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003978648,0.0001522093,0.000137337,0.0002062351,0.0007045003,0.0003729252,0.0001541307,0.0002648679,0.00008362767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003436231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000566312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003691985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004229306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984837,0.0002886706,0.0003171049,0.0003984483,0.000208748,0.0003032916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984334,0.0003947567,0.0003634846,0.0005450771,0.0001994816,0.00006380407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004924956,0.008156387,0.265818,0.001360534,0.0001014363,0.00004884336,0.1222931,0.00001386581,0.4602771,0.003753781,0.0428824,0.09480216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001617036,0.0002368519,0.787992,0.0007922087,0.00004730817,0.00002553709,0.001736985,0.001034519,0.1930126,0.01200785,0.001168157,0.0003289775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779727,0.0003010407,0.000076255,0.002422797,0.0005093737,0.000364644,0.00009182761,0.0000230536,0.01823825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991165,0.0000941651,0.00002614769,0.0001422489,0.00008990229,0.00004006699,0.00001484059,0.00001300491,0.0004631047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5221741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6206915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1208622366861696,"score_gpt":0.3172315363803064,"score_spread":0.1963692996941368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}