{"id":"W2636408194","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.006","title":"Estimating the value of life and injury for pedestrians using a stated preference framework","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Safety Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Pedestrian; Willingness to pay; Mixed logit; Value of time; Poison control; Value (mathematics); Revealed preference; Transport engineering; Injury prevention; Occupational safety and health; Statistics; Logistic regression; Environmental health; Economics; Engineering; Medicine; Econometrics; Mathematics; Travel time","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006135739,0.0008828208,0.001482642,0.001369021,0.0003601156,0.002685181,0.001784451,0.002747059,0.00396691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01904337,0.0009841673,0.001912853,0.001474084,0.0009788097,0.002870069,0.001266717,0.001887024,0.0002752909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001826635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001305341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01167547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009705795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976522,0.001656776,0.0000825668,0.0002087893,0.0001551931,0.0002444391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854753,0.0123784,0.000932937,0.0004047733,0.0003620737,0.0004465898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001118748,0.0009293334,0.06660092,0.00018852,0.0007897312,0.0006273336,0.0002731326,0.8322738,0.001068888,0.06107688,0.001231111,0.0338216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007390981,0.0003092083,0.006387657,0.00001980956,0.0001133736,0.0001049329,0.0002398737,0.9638739,0.0002692283,0.02832981,0.0002468592,0.00003145591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.793128,0.0007187686,0.2006564,0.001887833,0.00005257024,0.0001152578,0.0007161409,0.00004921741,0.002675757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858978,0.0002649672,0.01207951,0.00004716334,0.00003501414,0.00003452341,0.000287718,0.000005100309,0.001348215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01167547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03244925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4533568886126335,"score_gpt":0.3911845760505592,"score_spread":0.06217231256207428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}