{"id":"W2645811804","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.02.013","title":"Comments regarding: Cooper LF, Stanford C, Feine J, McGuire M. Prospective assessment of CAD-CAM zirconia abutment and lithium disilicate crown restorations: 2.4 year results. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:33-9","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","topic":"Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Abutment; Lithium disilicate; Dentistry; Orthodontics; Cubic zirconia; Medicine; Lithium (medication); Materials science; Engineering; Composite material; Structural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001578973,0.0008825901,0.001813572,0.0004463967,0.0004808333,0.0009292776,0.001439787,0.001006401,0.0001196738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003008448,0.0007194314,0.0006208281,0.0001744247,0.0006162258,0.0007354965,0.0006810205,0.002743517,0.00005754265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008918754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005780357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001243142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004360301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932607,0.0003120903,0.002751843,0.0008514907,0.002048497,0.0007753576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991429,0.0001661935,0.005359079,0.001610371,0.001151113,0.0002842289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005473619,0.0004345238,0.02091644,0.0007792258,0.0007444338,0.007961432,0.0001957483,0.000001580615,0.0009606092,0.0001499144,0.9666137,0.0006950496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008801149,0.001877041,0.103907,0.005267645,0.001424484,0.03243238,0.0003180201,0.00002028778,0.005865091,0.0007942935,0.8377957,0.00149699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.668511,0.008666751,0.002853332,0.2159235,0.03264788,0.0181221,0.02756152,0.0006560308,0.02505789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6636924,0.003125327,0.01486574,0.02817099,0.005880807,0.0006383102,0.002310954,0.0008817876,0.2804337],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2553758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03223397208504424,"score_gpt":0.3444895665410493,"score_spread":0.312255594456005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}