{"id":"W2648644805","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v10i1.5202","title":"Evidence to impact: A community knowledge mobilisation evaluation framework","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Community of practice; Government (linguistics); Knowledge translation; Futures contract; Traditional knowledge; Public relations; Psychology; Medical education; Political science; Business; Computer science; Pedagogy; Geography; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6280112,0.006264694,0.01166954,0.06335296,0.01388601,0.02993645,0.01380381,0.01371703,0.01106791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6324641,0.003250016,0.0128275,0.03559855,0.01844364,0.02109712,0.03148535,0.01221062,0.001321959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08858667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2000363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05157018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05368539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2632824,0.5870562,0.07416104,0.01126794,0.05753323,0.006699265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.333632,0.5238433,0.02615676,0.01798406,0.08929145,0.009092494],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002260126,0.00130734,0.009635561,0.1820394,0.007205372,0.0006471703,0.02363483,0.01240032,0.000552436,0.2511158,0.02347032,0.4857314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005368618,0.004567337,0.009969155,0.4722043,0.01429951,0.0003670678,0.02455577,0.01432796,0.002428527,0.202905,0.2482438,0.0007629999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02064766,0.08849205,0.2738999,0.1338359,0.00471704,0.2812949,0.01048401,0.001288582,0.18534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1393799,0.01132022,0.6379094,0.008111994,0.0002932189,0.1992575,0.002104536,0.0001675725,0.001455574],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3719888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6427442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9598708593039994,"score_gpt":0.8130205246968195,"score_spread":0.1468503346071799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}