{"id":"W2656327936","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2877","title":"Using “Tapestries” to Document the Collective Mathematical Thinking of Small Groups","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Educational Environments and Student Outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Structuring; Context (archaeology); Focus (optics); Representation (politics); Collective intelligence; Collective identity; Collective memory; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics education; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005485796,0.00007988735,0.0001656097,0.00001782661,0.002264689,0.0001300328,0.0005513281,0.00002741721,0.000105388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002331057,0.00004307416,0.00007307609,0.00007312061,0.0007062769,0.00009473065,0.0001569301,0.00008581489,0.00001261539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001897285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002618679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001338094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001749185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998236,0.0004935747,0.0003111486,0.0001420562,0.0006477354,0.0001695065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978141,0.001197813,0.0004435438,0.0004074943,0.00008805515,0.00004898439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009927179,0.00004468081,0.002842766,0.000004054983,0.00007206028,0.000004312488,0.6150846,0.00001663242,0.00002104911,0.3816749,0.0001372238,0.00008774652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001058725,0.00004328794,0.04281277,0.00004593119,0.00005414231,0.000007578081,0.464834,0.000005930555,0.00007942982,0.486909,0.00498248,0.0001195498],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8987949,0.00002694484,0.003394126,0.02365225,0.0002488369,0.0006330446,0.000002949176,0.000009615253,0.07323729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851567,0.000007720154,0.00310839,0.0002301023,0.0001129244,0.00003466726,6.375129e-7,0.00000683385,0.011342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1502506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2662975408930083,"score_gpt":0.5445553631733716,"score_spread":0.2782578222803633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}