{"id":"W2664273831","doi":"","title":"Design Considerations for Enhancing Word-Scale Visualizations with Interaction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Focus (optics); Word (group theory); Visualization; Scale (ratio); Human–computer interaction; Reading (process); Space (punctuation); Data visualization; Interaction design; Information visualization; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004051645,0.0003111499,0.0003390635,0.0002940896,0.0005102776,0.00145995,0.001040701,0.0001903737,0.00005084418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001824262,0.000316262,0.0001075304,0.0005173992,0.0001162417,0.0005667617,0.0008823763,0.0003265106,0.00002662561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001609368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009405747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001384797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002423621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953389,0.002554091,0.0005744386,0.0008187162,0.0004100532,0.0003038115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906205,0.002085245,0.0005834603,0.001835206,0.004658428,0.000217157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002841334,0.001520326,0.0002517163,0.000343373,0.000291777,0.0000075126,0.03950044,0.02171511,0.002113461,0.886571,0.0315262,0.01613069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007428463,0.0000018478,0.00005006624,0.001277922,0.00008328228,0.00002155553,0.0002700723,0.922797,0.03391925,0.02960984,0.01059706,0.0006292827],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.000485042,0.000110173,0.9879729,0.005484505,0.0002662284,0.0007155041,0.00005881872,0.0004007521,0.004506136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2021475,0.0001040496,0.7915772,0.000378624,0.00004168998,0.0002402618,0.0009154989,0.00005820616,0.004536931],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9010819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.048770162838525,"score_gpt":0.3023889474983232,"score_spread":0.2536187846597983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}