{"id":"W2688697929","doi":"10.1103/physreve.96.043312","title":"Effective optimization using sample persistence: A case study on quantum annealers and various Monte Carlo optimization methods","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical review. E","topic":"Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Office of the Director of National Intelligence; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Monte Carlo method; Persistence (discontinuity); Sample (material); Computer science; Quantum; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Statistics; Physics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00292922,0.000480715,0.0009848962,0.0005637049,0.0009165407,0.001048528,0.001228785,0.001325861,0.001935886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007765722,0.0003770825,0.0007402894,0.0009875891,0.002068485,0.001480059,0.001314846,0.001710684,0.0001410798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001194918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009366554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003027167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003311293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989605,0.0006012741,0.00003445999,0.0001016798,0.0002239825,0.00007814905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944283,0.004631465,0.0001766438,0.0003937494,0.0002150012,0.0001548799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005470724,0.00009660238,0.000634975,0.00008000443,0.00003553793,0.00008082292,0.0001179845,0.822217,0.001100589,0.1562963,0.0005232814,0.01876226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001898925,0.00003289834,0.0001243732,0.000006705954,0.000007297066,0.00001628665,0.00001536432,0.9768509,0.000869908,0.02098054,0.001070714,0.000005977154],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1953328,0.001080815,0.7904927,0.001015196,0.00005013423,0.000146761,0.0000500148,0.0003337493,0.01149775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6834573,0.0005145525,0.3115863,0.0001201762,0.00004343617,0.0002415642,0.00005778208,0.0001546447,0.003824227],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003027167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01549143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04778696707844649,"score_gpt":0.3944627409043357,"score_spread":0.3466757738258892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}