{"id":"W2688697929","doi":"10.1103/physreve.96.043312","title":"Effective optimization using sample persistence: A case study on quantum annealers and various Monte Carlo optimization methods","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical review. E","topic":"Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Office of the Director of National Intelligence; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Monte Carlo method; Persistence (discontinuity); Sample (material); Computer science; Quantum; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Statistics; Physics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000627461,0.0002377634,0.0004419283,0.00005580617,0.0008704793,0.0003251712,0.0004671454,0.00003003209,8.696658e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000627517,0.0001918852,0.0001172075,0.0001974699,0.00007845363,0.0003040368,0.0003461627,0.0002289049,9.703248e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004722226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000313693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003498326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003375481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981499,0.0005371697,0.0002096638,0.0006136588,0.0002377896,0.0002518727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981541,0.0005053576,0.0002753633,0.0008178702,0.0001171978,0.000130101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004231386,0.0001886422,0.0001261956,0.00009171797,0.0000322743,0.0001195055,0.001603709,0.9377359,0.00001453504,0.0001017552,0.000005897085,0.05997566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002828567,0.0004435114,0.0002974783,0.0003372103,0.00007872809,0.0001643273,0.00007675285,0.997864,0.00002037848,0.0002005417,0.00001489273,0.0002193163],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2786395,0.0006820578,0.7194961,0.0002110304,0.0001542838,0.0007315421,0.000003116589,0.00006138205,0.00002108179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7194141,0.0001490688,0.280134,0.0001475026,0.0001103366,0.00002726323,8.550791e-7,0.00001539963,0.000001523516],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4407746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.782485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04778696707844649,"score_gpt":0.3944627409043357,"score_spread":0.3466757738258892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}