{"id":"W2703332","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2002.005","title":"Overview of Freshwater Fish Studies from the Pulp and Paper Environmental Effects Monitoring Program","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Effluent; Benthic zone; Environmental science; Invertebrate; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Significant difference; Pulp (tooth); Toxicology; Fishery; Biology; Statistics; Environmental engineering; Mathematics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002610562,0.0001689014,0.0002870738,0.00003348683,0.0007914417,0.00007299472,0.0003963934,0.0001271692,0.00707361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001098162,0.0000926951,0.0001039372,0.00007864831,0.001768169,0.0003479868,0.000872714,0.0008108238,0.0003240148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002091515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001775657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007287631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000140672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963297,0.00157424,0.0004180222,0.0003206378,0.0006906315,0.0006667224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988238,0.0006242867,0.00007939868,0.0002915736,0.000005564944,0.0001753485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008384718,0.000834637,0.6005669,0.00005850069,0.0003148014,0.00009253406,0.008072977,0.00001863394,0.3377956,0.000009001753,0.009341918,0.04281059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00158161,0.001174007,0.6816099,0.0001185147,0.00005992314,0.0001306054,0.002797233,0.00005071921,0.2440996,0.005217346,0.06278272,0.0003777608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936728,0.002982692,8.886234e-7,0.002428349,0.0001714688,0.0003864034,0.00001692201,0.00001082224,0.0003296387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916732,0.006435558,0.0003878696,0.0003208442,0.0001835165,0.00006733049,0.000003427503,0.00001518997,0.0009130173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09369599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2191693181737882,"score_gpt":0.4159824480891855,"score_spread":0.1968131299153973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}