{"id":"W2714672313","doi":"10.1038/s41598-017-04182-x","title":"Carbon footprint of grain production in China","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":245,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China; China Clean Development Mechanism Fund; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Carbon footprint; Environmental science; Straw; Greenhouse gas; Irrigation; Life-cycle assessment; Agriculture; Agronomy; Carbon sequestration; Carbon fibers; Production (economics); Carbon dioxide; Mathematics; Biology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001272122,0.00009361957,0.0001232348,0.00003234729,0.0002727391,0.00007214698,0.0001927456,0.00004557294,0.0001166538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003261794,0.00007216669,0.00005042361,0.0001250824,0.0008247381,0.0001623579,0.0002659843,0.000090076,0.000006925475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002225663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001104277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002330291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008828585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985648,0.00002899287,0.0002889606,0.0005248257,0.0003670906,0.0002253755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985751,0.00000273391,0.0003014005,0.001049021,0.000004762737,0.0000669939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007063806,0.0001819303,0.8905855,0.00001489683,0.000002509833,0.00007933754,0.001107284,0.001270952,0.09646811,0.000008324346,0.0003625429,0.009911517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004435181,0.00001893613,0.9338074,0.00001156538,0.000003322283,0.00003957633,0.0001554151,0.00002511264,0.05604067,0.008044916,0.001717974,0.00009077883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819481,0.000008760665,0.000002181498,0.000373615,0.00167782,0.0002779052,2.166832e-7,0.00001097528,0.01570043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964006,0.000001409075,0.0001032337,0.000001698812,0.0000189174,0.000009532433,0.000002637904,0.000004346424,0.003457631],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04322185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3522718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00680353193227316,"score_gpt":0.2253977594793299,"score_spread":0.2185942275470567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}