{"id":"W2714672313","doi":"10.1038/s41598-017-04182-x","title":"Carbon footprint of grain production in China","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":245,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China; China Clean Development Mechanism Fund; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Carbon footprint; Environmental science; Straw; Greenhouse gas; Irrigation; Life-cycle assessment; Agriculture; Agronomy; Carbon sequestration; Carbon fibers; Production (economics); Carbon dioxide; Mathematics; Biology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003671522,0.0004521075,0.0001623584,0.001590929,0.0002858546,0.0005151066,0.0001869026,0.0001836945,0.0005523583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002007044,0.0001039665,0.0003631701,0.00211009,0.0002092178,0.0003088082,0.00032873,0.0001027831,0.00005849775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00224762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001323149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.100078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1002195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999826,0.0000255694,0.00001245281,0.00003034484,0.00006964968,0.00003615056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999809,0.00002797389,0.00004616872,0.00001850942,0.00007782583,0.00002067642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003068948,0.0000858128,0.8709629,0.0002298764,0.000331395,0.0007149414,0.0002834315,0.04927416,0.01387417,0.001412465,0.001263648,0.06126018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009660006,0.00005833541,0.9702243,0.00001535841,0.00006088287,0.00006248885,0.0002201983,0.02214272,0.004088772,0.0004497486,0.002648186,0.00001935727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954504,0.000363087,0.0009030908,0.000058144,0.000004734507,0.00001270765,0.001220253,0.00002703138,0.00196054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983012,0.0001584778,0.0003286726,0.00001237645,0.000001913563,0.000008753114,0.0007542761,0.000003115437,0.0004313166],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.100078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1989909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00680353193227316,"score_gpt":0.2253977594793299,"score_spread":0.2185942275470567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}