{"id":"W271579551","doi":"10.3138/jcs.37.3.219","title":"Conservation Biologists, Civic Science and the Preservation of BC Forests","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Citizen science; Political science; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Civil society; Environmental planning; Conservation science; Conservation biology; Nature Conservation; Public administration; Environmental ethics; Geography; Ecology; Ecosystem; Politics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001551967,0.00004472274,0.0001381557,0.000610415,0.0007852554,0.00005322802,0.000218968,0.00002141927,0.00003447707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003731767,0.00002951583,0.00003975107,0.0008547007,0.003105026,0.0005196149,0.00002213006,0.00008891047,0.000001266556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001085772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002009899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1614099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9534926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991388,0.00008138697,0.0002395498,0.00005708476,0.0003259492,0.0001572695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977754,0.0003369137,0.0002916178,0.00006325158,0.001440331,0.00009248371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009327963,0.00005650006,0.3306332,0.00004296017,0.0004799898,0.00001570148,0.133353,0.00004287961,0.000317548,0.2937143,0.2377618,0.003488856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008475478,0.0002469818,0.6688325,0.0001212098,0.0001030274,0.00001718051,0.1304507,0.0001378124,0.00005264249,0.01522187,0.1838212,0.0001472965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9303011,0.004723786,6.964355e-7,0.05258314,0.0003211367,0.000131149,0.000002692788,0.000003425647,0.01193293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958476,0.003470872,0.00008008435,0.0002915189,0.00007978143,0.000002264074,5.358972e-8,0.000001655589,0.0002261135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7920828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.106416170917669,"score_gpt":0.3460229686846891,"score_spread":0.2396067977670202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}