{"id":"W2724268121","doi":"10.5486/pmd.2004.3062","title":"On a composite functional equation arising in utility theory","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen","topic":"Functional Equations Stability Results","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hungarian Scientific Research Fund","keywords":"Mathematics; Composite number; Functional equation; Calculus (dental); Algebra over a field; Applied mathematics; Mathematical economics; Pure mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Algorithm; Differential equation; Medicine; Orthodontics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00162776,0.000807087,0.001009856,0.001602529,0.001610687,0.001964874,0.0008539537,0.001916753,0.008414394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004368403,0.000407316,0.001532644,0.001703157,0.002343159,0.004918789,0.002295341,0.00329726,0.0006350079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002138295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000982131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002633883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001546388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995571,0.0001860193,0.00002399133,0.00007052561,0.0001178793,0.00004457443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986168,0.0009273133,0.0000773612,0.00006340418,0.0002188908,0.00009615002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004184202,0.000004868521,0.00004851402,0.00001321145,0.000003433137,0.00002143167,0.00004338123,0.0008609318,0.00009539889,0.9964501,0.0008965736,0.001557997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004291383,0.000004544438,0.00007424854,0.000008156486,0.000004572608,0.0000341942,0.00001734495,0.007993644,0.00005082329,0.9894839,0.002319798,0.000004382789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1120861,0.007310373,0.6679483,0.01951726,0.001397532,0.00005468672,0.0003650888,0.0000991878,0.1912215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7852769,0.006590206,0.08520491,0.001735102,0.002081811,0.000169221,0.0003773364,0.0002268277,0.1183375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008414394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02814895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1030635087959562,"score_gpt":0.3119197638966551,"score_spread":0.2088562551006989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}