{"id":"W2727463241","doi":"10.1007/s12220-017-9895-z","title":"A Mixed Volumetry for the Anisotropic Logarithmic Potential","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geometric Analysis","topic":"Point processes and geometric inequalities","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Mixed volume; Logarithm; Mathematics; Polynomial; Minkowski space; Anisotropy; Volume (thermodynamics); Complement (music); Dual (grammatical number); Regular polygon; Mathematical analysis; Convex body; Pure mathematics; Applied mathematics; Geometry; Physics; Convex optimization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002131122,0.0001718511,0.0007428939,0.00293157,0.0007789115,0.0003941644,0.001150434,0.0001032977,0.0002023255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009854199,0.000104988,0.0012045,0.0032734,0.0001056002,0.0003432184,0.0001277629,0.0002473689,0.000005597839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007348429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000944274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003713925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979428,0.00005060394,0.0008345788,0.0001592101,0.0006862248,0.0003265539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945933,0.001568287,0.00207855,0.0006633454,0.0009940619,0.0001024698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001565831,0.003090533,0.1335458,0.001917877,0.1173952,0.0004767517,0.001715407,0.005704655,0.0002549567,0.07742646,0.1531685,0.503738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01248172,0.003174598,0.4267598,0.0001768188,0.09810045,0.0006103915,0.006755023,0.06998372,0.001313681,0.3156203,0.0628719,0.002151575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1925497,0.002019218,0.8035774,0.0009536974,0.0005276416,0.0001286253,0.00002626368,0.000009925414,0.0002075644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983158,0.0004611329,0.01303651,0.00005027467,0.0006268663,0.000005696622,0.00000163649,0.00001622915,0.002643635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7906083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07920257046252166,"score_gpt":0.3397670580620784,"score_spread":0.2605644875995567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}