{"id":"W2727692818","doi":"10.1002/eap.1596","title":"Predicting the abundance of forest types across the eastern United States through inverse modelling of tree demography","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Basal area; Abundance (ecology); Forest dynamics; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Forest inventory; Population; Forest plot; Spatial ecology; Biology; Physical geography; Demography; Forest management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006634675,0.0002549026,0.0002193151,0.0005149542,0.0001754618,0.0004332152,0.0004747749,0.0002772313,0.0005961265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001444577,0.0002727952,0.0004712177,0.0004704547,0.0001613845,0.0003526102,0.0003111929,0.0004164107,0.0001318357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008765858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000456701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09413511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09619111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998868,0.00003756941,0.000006994643,0.00004385566,0.00001290994,0.00001186941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994656,0.000242038,0.0000882461,0.00006518162,0.0001032857,0.00003555824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003486428,0.0000293269,0.228931,0.000009603664,0.00005104576,0.00003603684,0.00005439419,0.7613521,0.0004617042,0.0006178062,0.0003646409,0.008057658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003569014,0.000008301571,0.02719004,0.000003354778,0.000007644266,0.00001198725,0.00001541322,0.9719606,0.0001220674,0.0004460234,0.0002265964,0.00000442946],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835665,0.00004341235,0.01476919,0.00008385749,0.000005302165,0.000008314237,0.0007675086,0.00006668478,0.0006893126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949232,0.00003061965,0.004286626,0.00001077369,0.000001880481,0.000009494323,0.0005547322,0.000005701928,0.0001771215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09413511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1871744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03055352264520654,"score_gpt":0.2626975412013259,"score_spread":0.2321440185561193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}