{"id":"W2727951316","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0180414","title":"Rates of return to sorghum and millet research investments: A meta-analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wageningen University and Research; University of Minnesota; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Sorghum; Agriculture; Investment (military); Sorghum bicolor; Meta-analysis; Quarter (Canadian coin); Agricultural economics; Biology; Geography; Agronomy; Economics; Political science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0290595,0.001882217,0.00721851,0.008114056,0.0006451393,0.004194453,0.002046334,0.001798834,0.003312246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06539014,0.001287037,0.03796811,0.01229155,0.0007694367,0.002315157,0.00181741,0.002168192,0.0004060165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001565925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001888509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005699294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008624109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9747917,0.01177223,0.0062775,0.00425072,0.002267529,0.0006404128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9091641,0.0706012,0.01056026,0.004526073,0.004375415,0.0007729021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001659533,0.00002735432,0.07197311,0.04665553,0.8672734,0.0002232195,0.0001558993,0.0008177465,0.0001906209,0.0002420399,0.0009096823,0.009871895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002710027,0.0001785721,0.03971911,0.008055369,0.9483381,0.0002658548,0.0001110376,0.0003790863,0.0002319685,0.0003715404,0.002042567,0.00003575344],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.05927231,0.9315094,0.002587467,0.0007029814,0.0003044986,0.0001523086,0.0044286,0.00008733136,0.0009550759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7743431,0.2149453,0.003591416,0.001090601,0.0003314367,0.0005665692,0.00437811,0.000136704,0.0006166896],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9709405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1536832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8353172073417073,"score_gpt":0.4663760797353508,"score_spread":0.3689411276063566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}