{"id":"W2728143603","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.020","title":"Mismatches in stakeholder communication: The case of the Leslie and Ferrand transit stations, Toronto, Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainable Cities and Society","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Context (archaeology); Constructive; Content analysis; Public participation; Public relations; Computer science; Process (computing); Public interest; Public consultation; Sociology; Political science; Law; Geography; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002087826,0.00006960097,0.00008631254,0.000001044005,0.0013874,0.00007456606,0.0001709569,0.00003155546,0.0001139403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001012268,0.0000443745,0.00002630864,0.00001836246,0.0007042066,0.0002669882,0.0002026717,0.0000800725,5.175272e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002958786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005043481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.811968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.764678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995031,0.00004882436,0.000102182,0.00008431316,0.0001012456,0.0001602744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995839,0.00004754101,0.00006902893,0.0002614716,0.000005098428,0.00003294421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003555025,0.0002063639,0.6162963,0.0004471093,0.0001692795,0.0001251954,0.3072672,0.0005105747,0.0002378804,0.01750947,0.03854521,0.01864987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003318768,0.00001198647,0.4855043,0.000008855688,0.00001321784,0.00001028852,0.5084971,0.0001026701,0.0000371412,0.001535954,0.003868449,0.0000781532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910789,0.0006050517,0.000005002343,0.002048736,0.00002074369,0.0001852144,0.00001596141,0.000001685345,0.006038664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957079,0.0007166502,0.00003931489,0.0002961555,0.000006536117,0.00001049542,0.000001228555,0.000004165539,0.003217592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2012299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0159603523400424,"score_gpt":0.2417061482635681,"score_spread":0.2257457959235257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}