{"id":"W2730947195","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1345202","title":"The Achilles heel of the Canadian judiciary: the ethics of judicial appointments in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Impartiality; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Transparency (behavior); Law; Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial review; Representativeness heuristic; Accountability; Judicial activism; Public administration; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003024674,0.00008895309,0.0001599587,0.00001726841,0.009422161,0.00007580014,0.001179806,0.000190312,0.000007148701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006099447,0.00004768291,0.00006777496,0.0001498879,0.004165785,0.00007587911,0.0001756403,0.00149183,0.00000148898],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004523179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02822662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977208,0.0005226828,0.0002565237,0.0001161147,0.001056385,0.0003275237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997736,0.001309827,0.0002575562,0.000340109,0.0002878742,0.00006859875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079574,0.000007242767,0.03215261,0.000003479164,0.00003103464,0.000002506544,0.00843914,0.00002303172,0.000002866122,0.9579065,0.0007823497,0.0006412698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002191689,0.00001574949,0.4989013,0.0001559106,0.00003857683,7.332375e-7,0.01562873,0.00001609409,0.0000685418,0.1879847,0.296809,0.0001615385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09368746,0.0008867311,0.000002537802,0.632449,0.002406923,0.0004614374,0.0000889482,0.000005643915,0.2700113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966594,0.0004225544,0.000004143555,0.002618266,0.0001835132,0.000008506046,5.275404e-7,0.000003775764,0.00009931144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9029719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06405922035223657,"score_gpt":0.3406251412774748,"score_spread":0.2765659209252382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}