{"id":"W2731186053","doi":"","title":"The litigant in person and the access to justice dilemma : quo vadis South Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Status quo; Dilemma; Political science; Law; Adversary; Economic Justice; Common law; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003288385,0.0002648172,0.0003384865,0.0009403994,0.01168072,0.008208082,0.0006129143,0.004384647,0.005310341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005700292,0.0001993783,0.0002625791,0.001078347,0.01868605,0.007161911,0.007511239,0.004371452,0.0002558868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003212568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006203573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007241075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01129313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976087,0.001214624,0.00009874935,0.0001773108,0.0002806108,0.0006200329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998052,0.001074206,0.0002807792,0.00008259618,0.0001186105,0.0003918255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002004832,0.00003501317,0.00226738,0.0001464345,0.000009960857,0.002972474,0.1299347,0.0001012827,0.000455102,0.8514439,0.002837291,0.009776404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000338143,0.00008593364,0.006399261,0.001158461,0.00003009871,0.003942737,0.2989058,0.0004087824,0.0004752104,0.3898504,0.2986594,0.00005010783],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.404461,0.02612663,0.003471058,0.2392249,0.0008661019,0.00009708048,0.00003700755,0.00001240757,0.3257039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768957,0.004857465,0.0004514554,0.006515187,0.0001573605,0.00003232717,0.000004565395,0.000006045426,0.0110799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01168072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02330893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09857682815585109,"score_gpt":0.3544046010071707,"score_spread":0.2558277728513196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}