{"id":"W2731186053","doi":"","title":"The litigant in person and the access to justice dilemma : quo vadis South Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Status quo; Dilemma; Political science; Law; Adversary; Economic Justice; Common law; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013584,0.0001350698,0.0002530836,0.00008138228,0.0006953456,0.0004757325,0.000847431,0.00004719133,0.00008598669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006033381,0.00006066648,0.00007806662,0.000195658,0.001170246,0.0003998622,0.0001536474,0.0002087805,0.00004324644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000991659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006371483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002490342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007849913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982518,0.0004125329,0.0003694478,0.0001689582,0.0005252112,0.0002720783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975876,0.001405849,0.0003098983,0.0001135656,0.0004111793,0.0001719334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006289994,0.00003835376,0.001568513,0.000002987181,0.0001019952,0.000009190322,0.7007781,0.000008077151,0.00003753753,0.2938774,0.001450062,0.001498719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001806953,0.0001124715,0.001059252,0.0001588672,0.00006817191,0.0000068575,0.1527382,0.00006764715,0.00003055393,0.01819847,0.8255559,0.0001967195],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3232104,0.0114967,0.002291301,0.09171881,0.001993511,0.001020458,0.0002674244,0.00003942413,0.5679621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964733,0.000110013,0.00008743737,0.0001755416,0.0004519634,0.00001173039,1.726458e-7,0.000007864815,0.002681942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8241058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5348107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09857682815585109,"score_gpt":0.3544046010071707,"score_spread":0.2558277728513196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}