{"id":"W2732028845","doi":"","title":"MODIFIED LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST FOR HOMOGENEITY IN A TWO-SAMPLE PROBLEM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistica Sinica","topic":"Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Homogeneity (statistics); Likelihood-ratio test; Statistics; Statistic; Mathematics; Null hypothesis; Limiting; Test statistic; Null distribution; Applied mathematics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Asymptotic distribution; Score test; Computer science; Estimator","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007086783,0.000176324,0.0002946645,0.00008687425,0.0001084722,0.0001371225,0.0005755568,0.0000553647,0.000008008287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008696197,0.0001641895,0.00006327007,0.0003163058,0.00003979631,0.0001981395,0.0000669911,0.00014774,0.000007309478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003977894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002100876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006248969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001127538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982758,0.0001135101,0.0004224762,0.0005419683,0.000176277,0.0004700278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973603,0.001725111,0.0001022983,0.0005621994,0.0001015321,0.0001485872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001488542,0.0002130708,0.00004952336,0.00001268492,0.000004672103,0.000007974627,0.0002190473,0.00003339038,0.0006999246,0.7119522,0.001339774,0.2854529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001044058,0.0003539286,0.001911626,0.00002141871,0.000009401468,0.000004770355,0.00000267119,0.1571929,0.0003972092,0.8379772,0.0008506099,0.000234249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001411015,0.00005450278,0.9945902,0.001842541,0.00009098576,0.0005945344,0.0002097217,0.00009534548,0.002381132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2875938,0.000006975945,0.7116314,0.000600736,0.00004832983,0.00005260851,0.00001311921,0.000007693392,0.0000453218],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2874527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6695454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02727512647999491,"score_gpt":0.3327146872907085,"score_spread":0.3054395608107136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}