{"id":"W2732294592","doi":"10.1193/091816eqs153m","title":"Empirical Damage Relationships and Benefit‐Cost Analysis for the Seismic Retrofit of URM Buildings","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earthquake Spectra","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Read Jones Christoffersen (Canada)","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; National Institute of Standards and Technology","keywords":"Bracing; Masonry; Seismic retrofit; Unreinforced masonry building; Forensic engineering; Engineering; Seismic hazard; Seismic risk; Civil engineering; Downtown; Pedestrian; Retrofitting; Geography; Reinforced concrete; Structural engineering; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003098623,0.0001262426,0.0002602152,0.0001563731,0.0004640247,0.00009794433,0.0002531708,0.00007216934,0.00005209035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007049872,0.00009848978,0.0001989439,0.0002556071,0.0001179506,0.000195301,0.0000287995,0.0001954576,0.000008535098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001683925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000731787,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005281825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001617669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992562,0.000006780268,0.0002273423,0.0001678763,0.0001302067,0.0002116161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991056,0.0001402199,0.0000867803,0.0005747634,0.00003611961,0.00005650189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002915827,0.00002667557,0.8002985,0.00007871997,0.002319211,0.000003847585,0.001443262,0.1630384,0.0007513568,0.002117919,0.00122947,0.0286635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001781016,0.00001435424,0.6885758,0.000008017781,0.0004764879,0.000001191718,0.0001116895,0.3055876,0.00088236,0.0005384613,0.003522896,0.0001030073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717429,0.0003773395,0.02546927,0.00106861,0.00006458804,0.0001341592,0.00003319139,0.00005160323,0.001058308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982324,0.0002256515,0.0008994266,0.00005154864,0.0001212475,0.00001415557,0.00001294449,0.0000164014,0.0004262234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1425492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4016297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03434764088430588,"score_gpt":0.2708179645028483,"score_spread":0.2364703236185424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}