{"id":"W2732294592","doi":"10.1193/091816eqs153m","title":"Empirical Damage Relationships and Benefit‐Cost Analysis for the Seismic Retrofit of URM Buildings","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earthquake Spectra","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Read Jones Christoffersen (Canada)","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; National Institute of Standards and Technology","keywords":"Bracing; Masonry; Seismic retrofit; Unreinforced masonry building; Forensic engineering; Engineering; Seismic hazard; Seismic risk; Civil engineering; Downtown; Pedestrian; Retrofitting; Geography; Reinforced concrete; Structural engineering; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003290834,0.0006293905,0.0003928924,0.002235254,0.0002186113,0.0006790028,0.0008840002,0.0006025602,0.003383056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01424434,0.0003897361,0.000705657,0.0017322,0.000622555,0.0009941837,0.0006228766,0.0009048734,0.0002776919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007426448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01897645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02490232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989687,0.0005008471,0.00004722746,0.00009153126,0.0002591035,0.00013252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862098,0.01060622,0.001669577,0.0005188716,0.0008287395,0.0001667825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003980661,0.0002918829,0.09231088,0.0001097686,0.0001057159,0.0002004038,0.0001373418,0.881145,0.0008957548,0.004251626,0.0004733626,0.0196801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002251836,0.0006025268,0.1446872,0.00002667181,0.0000585805,0.0001676495,0.0003292119,0.8501195,0.0007220706,0.002284336,0.0009430411,0.00003673107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992268,0.0001845534,0.004454575,0.00007275832,0.000002370517,0.00006103875,0.0004804744,0.00001436742,0.002461779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997596,0.00009473075,0.00130818,0.000005318134,0.000002534261,0.0000211793,0.0003316973,0.000006199765,0.000634193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01897645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03773201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03434764088430588,"score_gpt":0.2708179645028483,"score_spread":0.2364703236185424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}