{"id":"W2732999591","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0180585","title":"Alternation between different types of evidence attenuates judgments of severity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Cognition; Alternation (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Event-related potential; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Computer science; Communication; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006644759,0.0005739357,0.0008249654,0.0006946152,0.0004896246,0.002570788,0.0007409772,0.00163582,0.004264155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06471393,0.0008816297,0.0006766627,0.0004681571,0.001204917,0.00301695,0.002398372,0.002611839,0.0002494004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006312597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004488514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005883595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008239539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892504,0.002961943,0.001713728,0.001745162,0.003947303,0.0003814407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9183621,0.05386646,0.01589352,0.007218766,0.002496716,0.002162417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01018232,0.002895569,0.1896423,0.001626946,0.0009522892,0.000876727,0.005143763,0.007295062,0.6409629,0.007415244,0.0008450637,0.1321619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004885808,0.006221799,0.8725355,0.0002248015,0.0006129316,0.001527263,0.001670625,0.02540419,0.06025904,0.02596317,0.004780448,0.0003115763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903907,0.0002280266,0.005940604,0.0002206466,0.00002063914,0.00006722773,0.00004826349,0.00006945981,0.003014355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889541,0.0001178504,0.01025553,0.0001317983,0.00001626101,0.00005880642,0.0001105155,0.00002305041,0.0003321359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006644759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03514123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6949334082849977,"score_gpt":0.4594220633871556,"score_spread":0.2355113448978421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}