{"id":"W2734665685","doi":"10.1186/s12942-017-0096-6","title":"Is gentrification all bad? Positive association between gentrification and individual’s perceived neighborhood collective efficacy in Montreal, Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Health Geographics","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Douglas Mental Health University Institute; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Gentrification; Collective efficacy; Population; Public health; Demography; Sociology; Geography; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Economics; Medicine; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007585114,0.0002796457,0.0003630487,0.001094567,0.004343668,0.00156807,0.00137918,0.0004040608,0.003991694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002711204,0.0002098515,0.0005316485,0.001753468,0.001200342,0.0004509533,0.001136154,0.0009593844,0.0001330003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03304825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03074479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993939,0.00007352458,0.00002165723,0.00009874443,0.0001553635,0.0002566843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976713,0.0001465079,0.000372631,0.00006553703,0.0008044094,0.0009395498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006131282,0.0000682138,0.9867179,0.00003343858,0.00007581519,0.0001034777,0.002689104,0.0001677209,0.0001703293,0.0004596521,0.003173931,0.006279127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005136312,0.00001654793,0.9948968,0.00004160347,0.00002443499,0.00001720878,0.003306458,0.0002725204,0.00003941798,0.0000554481,0.001310439,0.00001395593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934019,0.0006006631,0.0001398674,0.001145117,0.00002516772,0.00003171093,0.001185189,0.00001273667,0.003457596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979273,0.0002298859,0.0001126683,0.00008664206,0.00000574085,0.00001037458,0.0003698154,0.00000395453,0.001253567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03304825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2397829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0441068189328758,"score_gpt":0.3624329483761279,"score_spread":0.3183261294432521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}