{"id":"W2734786621","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.011","title":"Random forests as cumulative effects models: A case study of lakes and rivers in Muskoka, Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; St. Lawrence River Institute of Environmental Sciences; Credit Valley Hospital; Ministry of Environment; Carleton University; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks","funders":"Ministry of Environment; Canadian Water Network","keywords":"Watershed; Random forest; Environmental science; Multivariate statistics; Land use; Habitat; Cumulative effects; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Environmental resource management; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003176896,0.00020706,0.0003681096,0.00006124991,0.0002455738,0.00003666602,0.0003115249,0.0000387497,0.000128679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001272442,0.0001812106,0.00006393561,0.00003764866,0.000244672,0.0006501114,0.0005600186,0.0001601945,0.000003858069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006511844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008960371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1189962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2318657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982859,0.0001096392,0.000463771,0.00022026,0.0006757695,0.0002446922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998885,0.00006303503,0.0006094037,0.0002758924,0.000001360756,0.0001653133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003021994,0.001926046,0.9477921,0.0000437673,0.0002989387,0.01441523,0.005429773,0.01365825,0.000614309,0.0000179764,0.0001388275,0.01536265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007412772,0.0008021207,0.9734374,0.00005936118,0.0001498966,0.0002283641,0.01593169,0.0007876899,0.0001085418,0.0007897228,0.00006925622,0.000223218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962972,0.00005775887,0.0000352444,0.00004765757,0.0001282636,0.0006339143,0.000005753995,0.000001601927,0.002792653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992917,0.0001418367,0.0001942543,0.00005445586,0.00001559814,0.00001007876,5.515988e-7,0.00001472641,0.0002767708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1128695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8868704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01094488984375168,"score_gpt":0.2600524681174587,"score_spread":0.249107578273707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}