{"id":"W2734786621","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.011","title":"Random forests as cumulative effects models: A case study of lakes and rivers in Muskoka, Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; St. Lawrence River Institute of Environmental Sciences; Credit Valley Hospital; Ministry of Environment; Carleton University; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks","funders":"Ministry of Environment; Canadian Water Network","keywords":"Watershed; Random forest; Environmental science; Multivariate statistics; Land use; Habitat; Cumulative effects; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Environmental resource management; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003948779,0.0008696297,0.0007357772,0.00101473,0.001760559,0.002105693,0.002265056,0.001409245,0.001441982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01022851,0.0006562461,0.001082523,0.001799576,0.001092566,0.0009867807,0.0006779262,0.0009098367,0.000140259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008686191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007691399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9164689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9474032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986106,0.0009158492,0.00004744433,0.0001425301,0.0000737884,0.0002097039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910802,0.007590842,0.0002497501,0.000190867,0.0006894243,0.0001989067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001982769,0.0001392111,0.03113958,0.00008484116,0.0001965507,0.0005213595,0.0004247727,0.9458653,0.0002610582,0.007259954,0.001151345,0.01275773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004741968,0.00004721553,0.007351904,0.00002810458,0.0001130102,0.00006824384,0.0004900783,0.9867761,0.000157747,0.003856695,0.001023998,0.00003950313],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671218,0.001036136,0.02690377,0.0005772957,0.00002677503,0.0001793567,0.0008182771,0.0001888434,0.003147813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753572,0.0005119969,0.01933605,0.00005889584,0.00001109291,0.00007276134,0.0003796434,0.00005826678,0.004214129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08353114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1680461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01094488984375168,"score_gpt":0.2600524681174587,"score_spread":0.249107578273707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}