{"id":"W2734852884","doi":"","title":"Law of inertia for the factorization of cubic polynomials - the imaginary case","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas Mathematica","topic":"Polynomial and algebraic computation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Discriminant; Factorization; Integer (computer science); Polynomial; Combinatorics; Prime (order theory); Field (mathematics); Prime factor; The Imaginary; Square (algebra); Galois group; Cubic function; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004777965,0.00009116692,0.0001743021,0.00002269369,0.0003972911,0.00008815857,0.0009622534,0.00002591008,0.000009071294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002485106,0.00004857522,0.00009799809,0.00005630169,0.0002591786,0.00028742,0.0002427859,0.00004375897,0.000004083072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008863108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004027272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001692773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001324415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992347,0.00003820695,0.0003180931,0.0001397683,0.0001396634,0.0001295777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976256,0.0009248059,0.0003546044,0.0009743029,0.00009473788,0.00002588384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001279766,0.00008858524,0.00002546798,0.0001664867,0.00004962481,0.000004285945,0.002594841,0.00002238247,0.002527655,0.9739655,0.0007330915,0.01980924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007017698,0.0001930228,0.00154282,0.0001355749,0.0001069538,0.0001825147,0.0002649608,0.2583078,0.0336799,0.7027699,0.001891185,0.0002236198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04162834,0.0002823217,0.9492031,0.004655473,0.0004164496,0.0007681912,0.00003430145,0.00004033058,0.002971491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993563,0.000002470236,0.006226303,0.00006793665,0.00004757288,0.00002413434,0.000001240182,0.000005606397,0.00006175395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3055682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03418381600207925,"score_gpt":0.2960121452826704,"score_spread":0.2618283292805912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}