{"id":"W2735983895","doi":"10.5558/tfc2017-024","title":"The potential of agroforestry to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gases in Canada: Insight from pairwise comparisons with traditional agriculture, data gaps and future research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry; Agriculture Food and Rural Development; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Agriculture; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Vegetation (pathology); Carbon sequestration; Climate change mitigation; Soil carbon; Environmental protection; Soil water; Geography; Ecology; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003890369,0.000499194,0.0009199515,0.003750351,0.003621183,0.0031049,0.001489349,0.0003899123,0.002415617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00829496,0.0002129278,0.0009075864,0.01189584,0.001576381,0.001233833,0.001313086,0.0008777615,0.00009579262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06347957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1352197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970375,0.0004106076,0.0002233009,0.0002955076,0.001281795,0.0007512448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867961,0.002119929,0.001171683,0.0002521124,0.008474971,0.0011852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000937691,0.0001682906,0.5898618,0.012071,0.001909063,0.001027447,0.009719486,0.002785276,0.003248674,0.01145215,0.01928212,0.3475371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041584,0.000140787,0.9321037,0.003200985,0.001163866,0.000152792,0.0141893,0.001617387,0.001224669,0.00196269,0.04409165,0.000110508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.697584,0.2046513,0.002465605,0.02135878,0.0003048684,0.0003639957,0.02153617,0.0001193069,0.05161608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9585761,0.03246624,0.003909571,0.001165679,0.0000296021,0.00006257019,0.001969034,0.0000261024,0.001795054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06347957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4605787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06718917566513903,"score_gpt":0.2604136829669892,"score_spread":0.1932245073018502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}