{"id":"W2736401150","doi":"","title":"Conceptual Precision and Parliamentary Systems of Rights: Disambiguating “Dialogue”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Parliamentary procedure; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03879485,0.0005486042,0.0008871838,0.01067985,0.005971589,0.01769592,0.002107127,0.004068057,0.002894602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09580551,0.0006091752,0.0006999623,0.006943973,0.06411989,0.03756985,0.01237737,0.005249799,0.0003453071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01003252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005132436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002965278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001888781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9405288,0.04582075,0.002383969,0.003382975,0.006351009,0.001532441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.908403,0.07136662,0.008387447,0.007502194,0.003512755,0.0008279479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001467031,0.00000567017,0.0003758879,0.00005136321,0.00000434176,0.00002196864,0.02637674,0.0001291621,0.0001220889,0.9664536,0.0001963816,0.006248238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002987835,0.000031751,0.001784498,0.0003145628,0.00002239909,0.0001872487,0.01987811,0.001870198,0.0007353513,0.9433557,0.03175326,0.00003704698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2238824,0.01325902,0.3391372,0.03350157,0.0006587504,0.000330149,0.0001847211,0.0002178174,0.3888283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816132,0.0006771592,0.0154484,0.0004414372,0.0001492523,0.0001096715,0.00005722281,0.00004447405,0.001459239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03879485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2051692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03630339283605489,"score_gpt":0.2698295430549229,"score_spread":0.233526150218868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}