{"id":"W27369498","doi":"10.1063/1.4954243","title":"Electronic auditing as a viable method of training program evaluation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Educational Innovations and Challenges","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Training (meteorology); Audit; Business; Computer science; Accounting; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005252036,0.0003704006,0.000471233,0.001401791,0.0005604447,0.001890163,0.001385046,0.0007095531,0.009652952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01826367,0.0001901265,0.0001700635,0.001075856,0.0006372893,0.002390707,0.001625176,0.0008017974,0.001168757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000870603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001758046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001214805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001613993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963022,0.002221972,0.0001123059,0.0002672296,0.0008219406,0.0002741442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918402,0.004023768,0.0006704937,0.001615399,0.001472727,0.0003772851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007380745,0.0004838267,0.01190626,0.0001785696,0.00003680377,0.0001186573,0.0004520418,0.06397106,0.005978635,0.07445081,0.005904418,0.8357809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004312021,0.000350101,0.004153294,0.0001951882,0.00002853061,0.0001603902,0.0004648761,0.8985801,0.01776144,0.06158581,0.01662013,0.00005703263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1853052,0.0005417094,0.7498665,0.002232793,0.0002322866,0.0005449842,0.0006552109,0.007327081,0.05329429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8644864,0.0001538665,0.1258234,0.00009558483,0.00003034676,0.0001705211,0.0001852153,0.0001552066,0.008899482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009652952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03229231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06562905901809798,"score_gpt":0.3789597952786803,"score_spread":0.3133307362605824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}