{"id":"W2737155383","doi":"10.1007/s11150-017-9399-4","title":"Returns to scale in food preparation and the Deaton–Paxson puzzle","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Essex; McMaster University","keywords":"Economics; Scale (ratio); Returns to scale; Food preparation; Politics; Food processing; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Food science; Chemistry; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00299736,0.0004661659,0.000926353,0.0008411759,0.001127269,0.002616378,0.001002708,0.001994547,0.011005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01184032,0.0002994122,0.001076583,0.001602897,0.005136238,0.005449582,0.002226945,0.0022371,0.0007926436],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00195389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004300083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002556909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001600348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990011,0.0003264819,0.00004833562,0.0002961667,0.0001567057,0.0001711966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909692,0.004891302,0.00214349,0.001317127,0.000323395,0.0003553917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002655499,0.0000938594,0.01091182,0.0001550701,0.00008183878,0.000500356,0.0005532118,0.007062507,0.0007761819,0.9205719,0.004283801,0.054744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005050323,0.00005711142,0.01519398,0.00005486457,0.00002116786,0.0001947683,0.0003720104,0.003135331,0.0002727701,0.9622498,0.0183712,0.00002643561],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6408981,0.03285753,0.0760619,0.0680931,0.0004936763,0.0001147199,0.001048683,0.0002438601,0.1801884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800394,0.005550347,0.003596086,0.001811355,0.0004667041,0.00007355207,0.0001313777,0.00004022234,0.008290899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.011005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03681546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04352855011455729,"score_gpt":0.2930200108019808,"score_spread":0.2494914606874235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}