{"id":"W2737155383","doi":"10.1007/s11150-017-9399-4","title":"Returns to scale in food preparation and the Deaton–Paxson puzzle","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics of the Household","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Essex; McMaster University","keywords":"Economics; Scale (ratio); Returns to scale; Food preparation; Politics; Food processing; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Food science; Chemistry; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001480064,0.00006933248,0.0002879414,0.00001968622,0.000260687,0.00004309779,0.0006325437,0.0000480415,0.000002894356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000284941,0.00004578178,0.00009559665,0.00004861751,0.000274902,0.0001362325,0.0001383571,0.00006400081,0.000001127177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004281648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007210119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006472257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0168325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992583,0.0001169818,0.000311952,0.0001310962,0.00005927714,0.0001224202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988929,0.00006719102,0.0003683822,0.0006024938,0.00003150315,0.00003755189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001975117,0.0002793167,0.2599946,0.004343461,0.0001898386,3.109453e-7,0.05088401,0.001265042,0.00009121572,0.6633818,0.0044466,0.01492624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005822299,0.0004622116,0.5648974,0.01348037,0.0005364596,0.000007124836,0.01144912,0.002335147,0.001091187,0.1084982,0.2898941,0.001526361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771461,0.008283143,0.000003987666,0.003537663,0.000215772,0.0007153031,0.00002936812,0.000004780798,0.01006383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9183758,0.08085182,0.0001367212,0.0004425244,0.00004005567,0.00001371467,5.547757e-7,0.000006853264,0.0001318944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5548837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.939293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04352855011455729,"score_gpt":0.2930200108019808,"score_spread":0.2494914606874235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}