{"id":"W2737782654","doi":"10.1177/1354856516687235","title":"Playing at apocalypse: Reading Plague Inc. in pandemic culture","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies","topic":"Gothic Literature and Media Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Plague (disease); Pandemic; Context (archaeology); Popularity; Narrative; Politics; Sociology; Biopower; Video game; History; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Social psychology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Literature; Medicine; Disease; Art; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005238002,0.000111873,0.0002317446,0.00061613,0.0009998583,0.0003826863,0.00483695,0.0002787002,0.000124563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02681894,0.00007165041,0.0001073992,0.0003470964,0.001567125,0.0007047563,0.0007475893,0.001421736,0.00003951057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006765355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007934726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003327853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01098329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966624,0.0002120143,0.0004257689,0.0001913961,0.002091983,0.0004164722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969351,0.001061769,0.0004295783,0.0004015849,0.001040858,0.0001310966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004507288,0.00008936923,0.5332237,0.00002671803,0.0004671749,0.001096362,0.1360377,0.00002119729,0.02246064,0.06684543,0.07795608,0.1613249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002006554,0.0001944207,0.0131182,0.001484484,0.00006469095,0.000156491,0.1606073,0.0003033179,0.02535729,0.282902,0.5132712,0.0005341457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8907656,0.003927028,0.0002431668,0.09689043,0.004046285,0.0002366613,0.000004711215,0.000103376,0.003782731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846658,0.01254504,0.0006000175,0.00007758902,0.0007524022,0.000007991519,0.000002001284,0.000006808198,0.001342416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5201055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1028649716147043,"score_gpt":0.4391984002016764,"score_spread":0.3363334285869721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}