{"id":"W2737782654","doi":"10.1177/1354856516687235","title":"Playing at apocalypse: Reading Plague Inc. in pandemic culture","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies","topic":"Gothic Literature and Media Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Plague (disease); Pandemic; Context (archaeology); Popularity; Narrative; Politics; Sociology; Biopower; Video game; History; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Social psychology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Literature; Medicine; Disease; Art; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001852942,0.0009804402,0.0003152499,0.00159678,0.004870315,0.007647698,0.0007819895,0.002395533,0.005102657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006936727,0.0002262917,0.0002427667,0.0008372819,0.01074453,0.00771378,0.003565379,0.003057423,0.000933811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003011842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001058849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004170716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01150992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987727,0.0009091148,0.00002863092,0.00007265018,0.0001286519,0.00008820729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947774,0.004509134,0.0001871683,0.00009214393,0.0002154405,0.000218625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001463375,0.0001233806,0.002768795,0.0008559803,0.00001675306,0.001657335,0.7213852,0.0002458621,0.002134127,0.1612403,0.05722504,0.05220085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001999469,0.0001384425,0.004325744,0.001403535,0.00001643881,0.001084893,0.5082409,0.0006593344,0.001550057,0.03061776,0.4519006,0.00004232038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4531954,0.01868763,0.02146299,0.09866021,0.007113802,0.000277883,0.0003837495,0.0003128973,0.3999056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9373189,0.008318309,0.006230286,0.009209202,0.001150854,0.0001855792,0.0001413239,0.0002287894,0.03721672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007647698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02185249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1028649716147043,"score_gpt":0.4391984002016764,"score_spread":0.3363334285869721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}