{"id":"W2738583765","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11328","title":"Transforming the empirical likelihood towards better accuracy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Statistical Methods and Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Southern University of Science and Technology","keywords":"Empirical likelihood; Consistency (knowledge bases); Inference; Computer science; Computation; Econometrics; Empirical research; Likelihood principle; Likelihood function; Simple (philosophy); Statistical inference; Statistics; Mathematics; Maximum likelihood; Algorithm; Quasi-maximum likelihood; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02025684,0.0007953437,0.00161825,0.002985858,0.0006785787,0.00478068,0.002747727,0.001766337,0.005686398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.205206,0.0006980661,0.001686832,0.00294451,0.005339218,0.006689663,0.006163551,0.006957906,0.001264705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001887626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001652113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002496686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008755812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9796532,0.01203931,0.001025835,0.001989841,0.004809543,0.0004823169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8097176,0.1482423,0.007734376,0.02576307,0.007668269,0.0008743264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002885083,0.0001158211,0.01133388,0.0004537324,0.0002612588,0.0005649152,0.001239734,0.1983436,0.004790397,0.5928624,0.008771921,0.1809738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005039096,0.00006748048,0.002140237,0.0001240442,0.00005672885,0.000460759,0.0001558154,0.5476277,0.004036209,0.4371174,0.008105368,0.00005783438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0132914,0.0005071359,0.9810892,0.001522644,0.0001051409,0.00003312905,0.0001250203,0.0004132718,0.002913025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5319332,0.0007890804,0.4609243,0.001367007,0.0006197806,0.0001736759,0.0005425768,0.0008858106,0.002764545],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02025684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1071296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2495355119615442,"score_gpt":0.404086962509998,"score_spread":0.1545514505484537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}