{"id":"W2739081369","doi":"10.1111/cobi.12958","title":"Defending the scientific integrity of conservation‐policy processes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Society for Conservation Biology; Wilburforce Foundation","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Political science; Scientific integrity; Public relations; Uncertainty; Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Politics; Scientific evidence; Publication; Business; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Sociology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2220564,0.0009127224,0.001746302,0.005622196,0.01772987,0.04909211,0.007226644,0.01557544,0.004917356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.296988,0.001500068,0.001940711,0.005958489,0.05016216,0.02587496,0.0183451,0.01656823,0.001553176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02501175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08829345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01324372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007926512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.803843,0.1248413,0.01031842,0.01474728,0.03579767,0.01045231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5960121,0.2462911,0.03431748,0.07424372,0.04263625,0.006499419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001126064,0.00007690171,0.004315404,0.0003165692,0.000145646,0.0002894777,0.03400078,0.004324843,0.0007496988,0.9079853,0.006266224,0.0414167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066439,0.00006734478,0.002481455,0.001624936,0.0001156539,0.0001166015,0.0126227,0.00474839,0.00227487,0.7657205,0.2100606,0.0001003991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.08664694,0.007337585,0.1659404,0.43154,0.002087464,0.00130358,0.0003399166,0.0006696237,0.3041344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9270474,0.002161689,0.04242839,0.01667636,0.0006409406,0.000778008,0.0001483009,0.0002644433,0.009854505],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9844245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9593429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06704416889307023,"score_gpt":0.3386051812516653,"score_spread":0.2715610123585951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}