{"id":"W2739093259","doi":"10.25267/commons.2017.v6.i1.03","title":"Un marco para la toma de decisiones en evaluación y comunicación: resumen de investigación-acción","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"COMMONS","topic":"Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008675388,0.0002917132,0.0003801583,0.0001403892,0.004249377,0.001365262,0.002139742,0.0004342122,0.0005714599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005874862,0.0003040182,0.0001759565,0.0002118561,0.0009169696,0.0004989671,0.000405438,0.0006582526,0.0005082071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004337174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001313466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004530119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001007832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930094,0.004570644,0.0004828735,0.0004556823,0.0007784397,0.0007029193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949088,0.002098952,0.0004720947,0.001777455,0.0001800721,0.0005626593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008627322,0.0006039508,0.7307921,0.00004517385,0.0001499058,0.00002035172,0.0555467,0.00005786526,0.0007039117,0.06071619,0.04902019,0.1022573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006056643,0.00006443184,0.691157,0.0002159806,0.0001364445,0.000009751814,0.001737828,0.0006821982,0.0002302093,0.0263304,0.2784912,0.0003388363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8822008,0.0006004852,0.0002411519,0.06264174,0.0007280032,0.0003464805,0.000031178,0.0001440518,0.05306605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908642,0.0008130044,0.003401898,0.0003718828,0.0006113402,0.00007377229,0.00002271668,0.00003993244,0.00380127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.229471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07684812233020775,"score_gpt":0.4633751313396774,"score_spread":0.3865270090094696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}