{"id":"W2739249835","doi":"","title":"Race, Rhetoric, and Judicial Opinions: Missouri as a Case Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maryland law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Narrative; Race (biology); Status quo; Scholarship; Critical race theory; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies; History; Literature; Philosophy; Theology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002549349,0.0001962667,0.0003321018,0.002242512,0.02154608,0.005322717,0.001090398,0.002561771,0.002305005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004904274,0.0003110147,0.0002293236,0.005296084,0.004893751,0.001763717,0.002977155,0.003481859,0.0002060852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01871173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01299036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3495668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.630752,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984848,0.0005252146,0.00007185864,0.0001138768,0.0003298868,0.0004744688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995641,0.002919232,0.0004076501,0.0000869625,0.0004209103,0.0005242024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002601635,0.00122484,0.07183047,0.0005253813,0.00004612358,0.02027432,0.4023482,0.001426462,0.004053591,0.3729802,0.04855455,0.07647576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001357775,0.0003623448,0.1526844,0.001754099,0.0001543677,0.002428075,0.3531113,0.00306535,0.002750344,0.03143784,0.4519329,0.0001832608],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.879208,0.004842575,0.0007519643,0.01625767,0.0001518205,0.00008365133,0.000266649,0.00003322052,0.09840428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730418,0.00419011,0.0006542989,0.002608475,0.0000900946,0.00009211167,0.0001391913,0.00001345333,0.01917037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3495668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6950642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04814173127565492,"score_gpt":0.3730117145657373,"score_spread":0.3248699832900824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}