{"id":"W2739457506","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11326","title":"Testing perfect rankings in ranked‐set sampling with binary data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect; Type I and type II errors; Statistics; Statistic; Test statistic; Mathematics; Null hypothesis; Statistical hypothesis testing; Perfect information; Binary number; Test (biology); Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Null (SQL); Sample size determination; Sampling (signal processing); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Data mining; Arithmetic","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005905501,0.0001183645,0.0002441347,0.000139264,0.0004816243,0.000220862,0.000679269,0.00004444776,0.0001550695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008835238,0.0001051532,0.00001487208,0.0001202455,0.0002235108,0.0002318506,0.00003382537,0.0002725862,0.00001055209],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001192286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009654999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00174291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01071682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988957,0.00003553817,0.0004641704,0.0001460458,0.0001974959,0.0002610289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971387,0.001018643,0.0005198594,0.0005722858,0.0003825597,0.0003679017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000574027,0.0000848475,0.04545349,0.000226723,0.0001101811,0.0009683771,0.0006513051,0.0002621569,0.000111618,0.8900678,0.03672102,0.02528503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003599251,0.0003375192,0.5936731,0.00122251,0.0003276836,0.0007361549,0.0005601713,0.04671716,0.00002679088,0.3437513,0.008315691,0.000732642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03592986,0.00003918216,0.9569911,0.0007187074,0.0001171918,0.0001757624,0.00478345,0.000009106649,0.001235632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7001458,0.000002514547,0.2996224,0.00004816832,0.00005268591,0.000002109405,0.00009094393,0.00001510076,0.00002029579],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6642159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3875572739143564,"score_gpt":0.3952332945535968,"score_spread":0.007676020639240444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}